Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 12th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Lynn News Friday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

East/West split is for betterment of people of Norfolk



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 July 2008
The Boundary Committee acknowledges in its report of July 2008, that: West Norfolk Council proposed unitary authorities for Norfolk, based on an east-west division of the county.
This proposal was also the joint second preference of Norfolk County Council.

The draft proposals for Norfolk include a single unitary authority for the whole of Norfolk, which would have the constituent parts (being the county of Norfolk and part of Waveney), as set out in table 6 of the report.

This would serve the population of 868,428 (2001 census), plus the population of Waveney.

Similarly, two unitary authorities in patterns A and B as illuminated in tables 8 and 9 respectively, are "to serve the same population (second largest in the UK after Birmingham) and geographically one of the largest counties in the country".

After careful consideration of the proposals mentioned above, it is clear that the focus of the boundary committee has been on the city of Norwich as a main consideration, rather than the whole of the county (plus Waveney), thus depriving and ignoring any other major town in becoming an additional generating force for the socio-economical development in the county.

It would be unfortunate for the vast majority of people living in other major towns such as Lynn (the second largest town after Norwich), and living in such areas presently known as West Norfolk, parts of Breckland and North Norfolk – embracing quite a few major towns and villages being deprived of the opportunity to flourish.

'IGNORED'

The population living in the above- mentioned (ignored) parts of Norfolk, see Lynn as a major economic and educational hub.

They pay taxes to local as well as central government and wish to have their empowerment base nearer to where they live.

Furthermore, people of these areas are the biggest stakeholders for consideration and are significant contributors to the local economy.

Hence what is needed by the boundary committee, as well as the Secretary for State for the Communities, is to provide the county of Norfolk (with or without Lowestoft), two separate unitary authorities for the western and eastern sectors of the county, thus allowing Lynn and Norwich to flourish, for the betterment of the people living in all areas of Norfolk.

I hope these comments and thoughts can be taken into consideration before the final decision is made.

M. Hameed Malik

(parish councillor),

North Wootton

The full article contains 406 words and appears in Lynn News Friday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 July 2008 4:05 PM
  • Source: Lynn News Friday
  • Location: King's Lynn
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.