Kensington Palace has accused paparazzi photographers of harassing Prince George and Princess Charlotte, including at Anmer Hall and accusing them of going to “extreme lengths” to get pictures and urging the media not to use the images.
In a letter issued today, the palace said photographers were using surveillance techniques to try to get pictures of the young royals.
On one occasion last week a photographer set up a ‘hide’ in his car as he staked out a children’s play area.
Other incidents have included:
Photographers pursuing cars leaving family homes, using other children to draw Prince George into view in playgrounds, hiding on private property in fields and woodland around the Duke and Duchess’s home At Anmer Hall, and hiding in sand dunes on a rural beach to take photos of Prince George playing with his grandmother.
In the letter, Kensington Palace Communications Secretary Jason Knauf said: “It is of course upsetting that such tactics - reminiscent as they are of past surveillance by groups intent on doing more than capturing images - are being deployed to profit from the image of a two-year-old boy. In a heightened security environment such tactics are a risk to all involved.
“The worry is that it will not always be possible to quickly distinguish between someone taking photos and someone intending to do more immediate harm.”
The palace said that although most media outlets would not use images of Prince George taken by the paparazzi, “a handful of international media titles” were willing to pay for them.
This had led to the young Prince, who turned two last month, becoming their “ number one target”.
Mr Knauf said: “All of this has left the Duke and Duchess concerned about their ability to provide a childhood for Prince George and Princess Charlotte that is free from harassment and surveillance.
“They know that almost all parents love to share photos of their children and they themselves enjoy doing so.
“But they know every parent would object to anyone - particularly strangers - taking photos of their children without their permission.
“Every parent would understand their deep unease at only learning they had been followed and watched days later when photographs emerged.
“The Duke and Duchess are of course very fortunate to have private homes where photographers cannot capture images of their children.
“But they feel strongly that both Prince George and Princess Charlotte should not grow up exclusively behind palace gates and in walled gardens.
“They want both children to be free to play in public and semi-public spaces with other children without being photographed.”
In the letter, Mr Knauf said Duke and Duchess of Cambridge had “expressed their gratitude to British media organisations for their policy of not publishing unauthorised photos of their children”.
He added: “They are pleased also that almost all reputable publications throughout the Commonwealth - in particular Australia, Canada, and New Zealand - and in other major media markets like the United States have adopted a similar position.”
He said the couple “have been delighted to share official photographs of Prince George and Princess Charlotte in recent months to thank the public for the thousands of kind messages of support they have received.
“News photographers have had several recent opportunities to take photos of the family and these will be a regular occurrence as both children get older.”
But he added: “Despite this, paparazzi photographers are going to increasingly extreme lengths to observe and monitor Prince George’s movements and covertly capture images of him to sell to the handful of international media titles still willing to pay for them.”
He went on: “It is clear that while paparazzi are always keen to capture images of any senior member of the royal family, Prince George is currently their number one target.
“We have made the decision to discuss these issues now as the incidents are becoming more frequent and the tactics more alarming. A line has been crossed and any further escalation in tactics would represent a very real security risk.”
Royal officials have issued similar statements in the past but have rarely gone into such detail.
Legal action has also been taken to curb the actions of paparazzi photographers and magazines which use their pictures, for example after topless photos of the Duchess of Cambridge on holiday in France appeared in 2012.
In an other case, when the royal couple believed their son had been harassed by a photographer during a trip with his nanny to Battersea Park last autumn they asked, through their lawyers, for the individual to stop “following” the toddler prince.
Mr Knauf said the palace was continuing to take such legal action. But he added: “We are aware that many people who read and enjoy the publications that fuel the market for unauthorised photos of children do not know about the unacceptable circumstances behind what are often lovely images.
“The use of these photos is usually dressed up with fun, positive language about the ‘cute’, ‘adorable’ photos and happy write ups about the family. We feel readers deserve to understand the tactics deployed to obtain these pictures.
“We hope a public discussion of these issues will help all publishers of unauthorised photos of children to understand the power they hold to starve this disturbing activity of funding.”