Home   Whats On   Article

Subscribe Now

Thor: Love & Thunder with Chris Hemsworth and Natalie Portman review – has the MCU jumped the shark?




Thor: Love & Thunder (12A) review

Phase four of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) has been a bit 'after the Lord Mayor's show' following the epic Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame. While entertaining at times, Thor: Love and Thunder (Thor Four?) had me seriously wondering at times whether the MCU has jumped the shark.

Director and co-writer Taika Waititi, riding high fresh from the success of Thor: Ragnarok, Jojo Rabbit and the series What We Do in the Shadows, tries to repeat the all-out comedy formula that worked for his previous Thunder God outing after it was felt this corner of the Marvel franchise had grown gritty and dull with the Thor: Dark World second outing.

Jane Foster and Thor.
Jane Foster and Thor.

So Thor's (Chris Hemsworth) love interest, Jane Foster (Natalie Portman) – last seen in Dark World and pretty much forgotten-about – is resurrected here.

Ace physicist Jane has stage four cancer so in a quest for a cure she seeks Thor's hammer Mjolnir – which was shattered by Thor's sister Hela, remember?

A super-powered Jane and Mjolnir gatecrash Thor's fight with creatures summoned by villain-of-the-film Gorr the God-Butcher (Christian Bale) who kidnaps the children of New Asgard, which is now run by Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson).

Thor.
Thor.

The two Thunder Gods, Valkyrie and stone-being Korg (voiced by Waititi) form a motley group seeking help from the rest of the pantheon of Gods but are rebuffed in a pretty-pointless cameo from a well-known actor with a ridiculous spoof-Stavros from Harry Enfield accent.

It seems this cameo is just an excuse to introduce another adversary in the mid-credits sequence.

Bale comes out with a lot of credit for a nuanced performance, Hemsworth is charming as usual but is wrestling with a patchy script – the bit where he splits with travel buddies The Guardians of the Galaxy is painful at times – Portman looks a little lost while Thompson's patented bored look seems designed to exasperate or offend.

The balance of humour to drama, which worked well in Ragnarok but I had reservations about at the time, has skewed to too smug and silly; and the tone is all over the place.

Maybe Waititi has started to believe the hype, got too overworked or just doesn't care too much. There certainly is a whiff of "let's laugh at and belittle the source material".

Remember, ladies and gentlemen: this source material, by Jack Kirby, Stan Lee and many others, is paying your huge salaries.

* Any easter eggs? Loads of cameos and characters. Marvel cosmic figures the Celestials, The Watcher and Living Tribunal are just the minor ones.

Peter 'The Watcher' Woodhouse



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More